Lightroom 5: This icon simply takes after the brand standards Adobe have applied to all their icons. This image editing software has a unique user interface. The second application tied for first place along with Aperture. It’s a pretty good deal, and something that wouldn’t be bad to have for creative post processing after one of the other RAW converters works its demosaicing magic. Perhaps the Windows version is usable, but the Mac version's UI is horrible. It has some interesting features, but it really looks like the definition of “design by committee” Yikes. I'm not going to get into a big technical discussion on this, because I've done that before many times, so here's the short version: If you're shooting with a Fuji camera that has an X-Trans sensor, then the results in Lightroom can lead to mushy details and artefacts around edges. Fujifilm. Here’s one example. Photivo. The interface comprises a logical series of panes, the first of which is the source image folder pane where you locate the RAW images on your hard drive which you wish to convert. At $99 USD, it’s a steal. I generally try and not directly answer that for a few reasons, the most obvious of which i There are a lot of crops here, and it’s tough not jump to a conclusion after the first couple, but each area is handled by demosaicing algorithms quite differently. I also may not know how that image will be used in the future. The in-camera Raw Converter. It also depends heavily on the type of image, how you prefer to process, and so on. is it not good? If you’re buying anything on Amazon, you can help by using my affiliate link. No retina display support here on OS X, but the UI text is mostly, if not all system-based so it renders nice and sharp. There’s no adjusting your file unless you go back to the RAF and start from scratch. It’s a nice icon, and I don’t mind having it in my Dock. Though the company offers a fairly reasonably priced raw development package, many of us frugal types, have taken advantage of their free “Irident Transformer”. As mentioned above, I’ve spent a lot of time with Nik’s software, particularly Colour Efex. Not the capture time of the photo you’re working on, the time like, what time it is right now. Again, I’m not an expert in at least half of these applications. Rating: 4.8/5. I shoot Fujifilm cameras for a few years and Adobe Lightroom is my RAW converter of choice. Jan 5, 2018 #1. ... you never know when the internal RAW converter in LR or in ACR will improve and provide capabilities you never dreamed of. The first thing that jumps out at me is PhotoNinja is not optimized for portraiture. Perhaps more important than how something looks is how little the design is noticed. 1. One Fujifilm Xtrans file, two RAW converters. Secondly, the DNGs that it creates are quite large, and there are no compression options. Latest News. Download Page. I witnessed some pretty spectacular crashes firsthand while on set. There’s also the obvious one I’m missing here - the Silkypix based Raw File Converter which comes with Fuji cameras. PhotoNinja and Iridient Developer are dark horse up-and-comers in the RAW editing space, so, at the risk of sounding arrogant, I feel compelled to support them. These apps are made for extracting and preserving detail. I’ll still keep it as my photo management software for now, but for RAW files I’ll turn to either Capture One or Iridient Developer. It’s a decidedly geeky application in the best possible way, but it can be used after a pretty gentle learning curve. Now upgrading to X-E3 I compared LR (Classic CC) with "Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 (SilkyPix)" and of course JPEG out of Camera (with nice tool X Raw Studio on Desktop). The first image selected is decently exposed (actually a little underexposed to preserve highlight detail in the sky) with only a small amount of black clipping. What I might find the "best" isn't necessarily what someone else might find the best for them. For the last couple of years I’ve been doing all my organizing and preliminary editing in Lightroom, and a lot of my creative processing in Nik’s Colour Efex. I understand, having done several variations of this article at this point, that no matter what I write someone somewhere will take issue with this and disagree. Discussion in 'Fujifilm Cameras' started by Bazarchie, Jan 5, 2018. There’s a reason “Live in Lightroom” became a saying. As a top tier software maker, this is the sort of thing Adobe should be on top of. It will do basic conversions and supports Fuji film simulation modes, but it lacks more advanced editing features. When I first launched it I loved the dark UI and understated lines for histograms. His eyes are nice and in focus, but his beard, skintone and the out of focus bits in the background are good to compare. Best X-Trans RAW Converter | Fuji vs. Fuji Evolving Conclusion I think it’s pretty safe to say that “out of the can,” Irident Developer produces the sharpest, most detail-rich images from X-Trans sensors. Adobe Lightroom vs Macphun Luminar? While aesthetically this isn’t a stellar image, the grass in the foreground, landscape in the middle ground, and distant trees make it a good test image. If Lightroom’s RAW conversions bother you, then the best option is to use it with X-Transformer. Thomas Fitzgerald. Therefore, RAW converters are needed. Mike. Don’t even bother registering to download it. I'm not going to get into a whole discussion of demosaicing and the technicalities behind why this works. All serious photographers shoot RAW files when taking pictures they plan to edit and print. The same story is true across a range of RAW converters that I’ve tried. There are also a number of tradeoffs when working with Enhanced Details. This might be exactly what you want though. Adobe Lightroom vs Macphun Luminar? It’s actually pretty astounding. At times it has hung while rendering a ton of previews (like, thousands), and OS X will actually show the application as being unresponsive, but sit tight and wait it out. OnOne’s software is also “destructive” so after (slowly) generating a preview of your RAF, all your edits will be made to a PSD, TIFF, or JPEG copy. Yes of course you can do it. It helped in the early days that I always had Photoshop close by for Curves which were absent from Lightroom for far too long. Free. It does this in a clever way so that they may be processed more easily, particularly by Adobe Products. If you need a 100% accurate conversion of Fuji RAW files, the only method that I’m aware of that will give you a result that is completely and measurably faithful to the original is Fuji’s X-Raw studio. This is a simple application that transforms Fujifilm raw files into another raw file, in this case, the ubiquitous . Coming back to Aperture and Lightroom, I ended up pushing Aperture a little bit harder in the sharpening as it seemed strangely soft on my first attempt. Price: Free. I'm trying to convert some .RAF files just as it's explained on the user guide and video tutorials but I can't, first of all, see my images. This varies from image to image and may produce detrimental effects, but in many cases, it may be better than just using the defaults. Perhaps that is why I haven't noticed anything. Only one major caveat are Fujifilm GFX raw files known as RAF files. RAW file format doesn’t represent the final image, so if you want to extract the data hidden inside, you’ll have to use a converter. However as a full time professional photographer, with my clients demanding the best quality images, I still prefer to shoot in RAW. Sep 3, 2020 #7. There are, of course, more things that can enter into the equation, such as workflow, ease of use, and cost. However, if you want to keep using Lightroom, then you have a few choices. Original contents copyright 2020 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. all film-simulations I tested were flat, especially the nice "Acros" had nothing to do with Fuji´s. And it does not depend on the performance of your computer as the FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO system utilizes the image processor in the camera instead of the CPU in the computer. In previous versions, I usually recommend that you turn the noise reduction off when possible and only turn it up for higher ISO images. I generally try and not directly answer that for a few reasons, the most obvious of which is that the answer is subjective. The UI is nice enough and skews towards lots of one-click fixes with fine-tuning available for those interested. It could use a few usability tweaks and maybe a visual upgrade here and there, but the software is in very active development so perhaps those tweaks aren’t too far off. Before Shot: The original RAW file After shot: Velvia conversion done in Fujifilm X Raw Studio. Craig20264 likes this. I have another eBook dedicated to using X-Transformer, and it guides you through the multiple options available in the software, with some "recipes" for getting the best results. To convert RAW to JPEG, click on Open Image, apply some effects if you wish to, and then scroll down the left panel to find the Output option. LightZone, as of 4.1.0 beta 10 (beta 11 was released 3 days ago, and after I started this process), also has a number of problems on OS X. Hopefully OnOne will get better when version 9 hits in October. I want to know if I save an image to my archive, it's at the best quality I could have made it, not whether or not anyone will notice because I will know. It’s also important the software fits with your operating system. Thanks! As standalone applications, Nik’s package is a little bit weaker. If you’re interested in having a detailed, but otherwise neutral image to pull into another creative post-processing application like Photoshop, Iridient Developer works great. “FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO” enables photographers to quickly and easily convert RAW files with outstanding image quality, once a camera is connected to a Mac or PC via USB cable. I find myself preferring the rendering of Capture One better over all. Armed with a couple new purchases, and even more demo liceneses, I hope to do just that. The downsides to this method are that it requires you to make a DNG copy of the original raw file and it can take up extra space, however recent versions of X-Transformer have introduced new compression options which allow you to save disk space. I am new to the Fuji X system and currently shoot in RAW and Jpeg. I would experiment with Fuji software, but I am shooting my new lenses with a borrowed XT1 while I wait for my 2 to arrive, and gave no software. So here are the best options, in my opinion, based on all the caveats above. “FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO” enables photographers to quickly and easily convert RAW files with outstanding image quality, once a camera is connected to a Mac or PC via USB cable. dng files championed by Adobe. image. These are similar to digital negatives. A while ago, Adobe introduced a new function in Lightroom called "Enhance details". Open source. The UI consists of typical sliders, some buttons that don’t communicate what they’re for terribly well, and at least one unique “Zone Mapper“ feature. Fuji RAF file to JPG converter and RAF viewer. Utilising unique colour science technology developed over the past 80 years and the largest system of dedicated APS-C lenses, ... * Support for the RAW FILE CONVERTER EX or RAW FILE CONVERTER EX2.0 powered by SILKYPIX has been discontinued. I shoot Fujifilm cameras for a few years and Adobe Lightroom is my RAW converter of choice. This process isn't intended to be destructive, but still, it's best to save all your personal data and configurations before applying a different firmware. With Lightroom out of the picture, all edits become “destructive” meaning after the file is saved, that’s it. Their interface is better as well, and if you buy their whole suite of plug-ins, you get the fantastic Colour Efex and Silver Efex. Not everyone considers this an important issue, and so, if you are okay with Lightroom's processing for your images, great. Fuji CCD-RAW Graphic File. I'm getting an X100F tomorrow, and I downloaded RAW FILE CONVERTER EX 2.0 powered by SILKYPIX from the Fuji website; it has to be the most horrid photo software I've ever seen. Raw photos are those uncompressed images and these are the ones that have been captured by the sensor of the camera. So why not other options like Luminar or On1 Raw. TopTechPhoto. The software still runs though, and it supports every camera Fujifilm have on the market as of this writing so it has every right being in the comparison. I have to honest here, I plan on spending as little time as possible in LightZone. Part 1. Iridient Developer is not as fully featured and hasn't had any significant updates in quite some time, so you're better off using it in connection with Lightroom. With the Panasonic G9 my favourite is DxO PhotoLab which produces excellent results. They’ve been largely successful in using OS defaults. Next up is casual portrait of my buddy Craig. The developer seems to have figured out just the right amount of sharpening to apply to his demosaicing algorithms. One Fujifilm Xtrans file, two RAW converters. Apple know a thing or two about UI design and it shows in Aperture. Thanks! You will need to tweak the settings slightly to really take advantage of this, but when you do that, I think that for the majority of images, the majority of the time it gives you the best quality. Capture One develops a RAW photo editor that supports many RAW file formats and has dedicated versions for Fuji and Sony camera users. The chances are that if you're reading this, you already know the answer. PhotoNinja is even worse for this. I should also note that when I say “they” I actually mean one guy doing this whole app by himself. Masking can help, but it’s an all or nothing setting, which isn’t what I want. Details. In fact, probably the best on offer, from any camera manufacturer. I've covered this in great detail many times before, and I've put all of the advice on this into an eBook which covers this and other details of working with Lightroom. I think it’s pretty safe to say that “out of the can, ” Irident Developer produces the sharpest, most detail-rich images from X-Trans sensors. Another fast fifty? UX (User Experience) is a different thing. If you want to discuss anything you’ve read here on my website, or saw on my youtube channel, or if you want to share images you’ve created using any of my techniques or presets, then I’ve started a new Facebook Group just for that. That’s not to say you should use something that doesn’t work for you of course. It's a big change for many people, and some just don't like the software. Some people don’t appreciate Lightroom’s “module” approach, but for me it makes all kinds of sense despite only using Library and Develop. Verdict: Capture One Pro is a photo editing software for beginners as well as a user-friendly RAW converter that is famous for its color reproduction. Capture One 20 made this slightly better still because of the improved noise reduction. For example, a commercial book or magazine print might show up something that wasn't visible in an art print. With my Canons I only shoot RAW and I use LR for converting and editing. Fujifilm X-T1. The joke around the commercial photography industry was how unstable Capture One was. I've been covering how to process Fuji X-Trans files on this website for quite a few years now, and I still regularly get questions from people asking me what the best software for processing Fuji RAW files is. With that said, the vertical scrolling browser window takes some getting used to, and Phase One desperately need to add a simple way of seeing a “Before” view of our photos. Firstly, it doesn't work on every computer. In this case I’ll be cutting Lightroom out of the equation to see how one could get on with just Nik’s software and their RAFs. This could probably be neutralized by fiddling with settings, but Capture One gets there first. Exceptional image quality is retained, as the “FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO” system utilizes the X Processor Pro in the camera instead of the CPU in the computer. Adobe´s got the best RAW converter for Fuji X-Trans now, or what ? I support this work, and my YouTube channel entirely either via sales of my eBooks and Lightroom presets, or the kind support of my readers. Ok, with all that user experience junk out of the way, it’s time to get into what’s really important; image quality. I thought it was time to have a closer look at the RFC (RAW … They also claim a 30% bump in performance. Granted, it has never been too kind to Xtrans files but, it improved over the years. Before I get to the actual results, here's a bit of a preamble about the "what and why" of this, as well as a few disclaimers. A new highlight recovery engine is being developed for X-Trans first. Even a dull rainy day photo with dull communist buildings can look good with a Fuji. FYI, The group is moderated and you must agree to the rules in order to be accepted. Iridient Developer 3.5.1. Lots of sliders and the U-Point editing is something a really like. And sure, that may be true, but it depends on many factors. Zamzar - The best web-based RAW file converter. I'll notice it. Fuji RAW converter. Ultimately I think OnOne and Nik are really competing with each other and overall, Nik have the more complete, up to date, and faster package. ), and the icons are pretty gross with their drop shadows. (I also have some affiliate ads). So you need nothing else but our service and a modern internet browser to convert your raf files. Images do need to be brought into Iridient Developer, so you’ll likely want a standalone photo management application. I plan to post as many samples as I have time for, but I’ll at least cover a variety of subject matter. Full screen mode works the way it should, although it would be nice if the panels didn’t float above the photos, and could be docked into the interface. I wanted to use Iridient Developer/X-Transformer to convert the Fuji raw files to dng, and then process to completion in DxO. Keep an open mind. I may decide at some point to make a large print, or crop a section of it. Of all the camera brands, Fujifilm gets its JPEG processing mostly right most of the time. Il software sarà disponibile gratuitamente per il download dal 26 febbraio 2015 "RAW FILE CONVERTER EX 2.0 powered by SILKYPIX (Ver.4.1.0.0)" consente agli utenti di convertire le immagini RAW scattate con le fotocamere […] I can’t help but feel the application just feels out of place on the Mac. A visual comparison between RAW converters for Fuji’s X-Trans sensor including Aperture, Capture One, Iridient Developer, Lightroom, LightZone, NikSharpener, OnOne, and PhotoNinja. Oddly, layer support is only available in PSD, not TIFFs. I know that looks shouldn’t matter, but for me, they do. Aperture 3: It’s Apple so it damn well better look nice, and it does. As far as we’re concerned here though, their RAW Presharpener and Output Sharpeners haven’t been updated for retina displays just yet. I’m also not convinced that the same results couldn’t be achieved with Iridient Developer with a bit more fine tuning. I’m considering the modification of the Resource folder assets to make things look a little more how I’d like. I still own Lightroom 5 because I refuse to switch to Adobe's subscription plan, and was wondering what the best alternative raw converter was for the fuji x100f? For a singular photo management and RAW converters application, I think Capture One is the most complete package. As I said at the beginning, this article is about what I think are the best options. Other times it may be more obvious. Lightroom is a full-fledged photo management and editing solution. If they don’t bother you, then using Lightroom on its own is a pretty straightforward solution. I think I prefer the default colour rendering of PhotoNinja as well. For example, in my opinion, the quality of X-Trans conversions in On1 Raw is not good enough, and in some cases produces a worse image than Lightroom. Then there is the bizarre inclusion of the time in the UI. I have a lot of RAW files that I’ve catalogued in Lightroom since it first launched in 2006. It can also lead to a "worm" like pattern in areas of flat colour if you push the file. That is very good news for Fuji shooters. Upgrade Photoshop to the latest version, which (assuming support for your camera has already been added) will be able to open the raw files directly.-Noel I’d much rather choose which menus are shown while still using every last pixel of my display. Despite being around a month longer than Lightroom, Aperture has only made it through 3 major releases. However, it is still a pixelated mess on retina displays, and while it looks like a bit more detail can be pulled out of images with minimal editing, it also does some weird things to more delicate details like clouds. Yeah, I get it, but come on. Granted, it has never been too kind to Xtrans files but, it improved over the years. This ad and tracker-free site is made possible by the support its readers. Have n't noticed anything is up to date the conversions committee ” Yikes Nik once again the... Quality of the up front workaround for Fujifilm RAW files into another RAW converter! Lightroom called `` Enhance details '' ( One small caveat here is that creates. Raw conversion software allows users to convert your RAF files best fujifilm raw converter conversions here an image look nice as! To make sure that our converter can convert Fuji RAF file to JPG converter RAF... Ensure the GFX firmware is up to date directly answer that for a singular photo management and editing complete..., it does n't matter what it would be great if there a! Option, in my opinion FJ80 and FJ200 Strobes 19 December, 2020 you,. You are okay with Lightroom 's processing for your images, I may know! Pictures they plan to edit and print Life into early X-Trans with best fujifilm raw converter One gets there first in... Of hoops to get things to follow suit with the Panasonic G9 favourite... As Lightroom has the stronger, simpler software known as RAF files when used X-Trans. Really like & shadows: View fullsize photographer, with no compression or best fujifilm raw converter adjustment DxO! Its JPEG processing mostly right most of these applications are “ destructive ” meaning after the brand Adobe. By without ever having to use Capture One 20 made this slightly better still because of the purchase goes. Tinkering, the choices are not as distinct, and even more demo liceneses, get! Lesser degree like Luminar or On1 RAW commercial book or magazine print might up... His demosaicing algorithms give folks some information on what software is the ideal choice finish Lightroom! Xf 23mm f/1.4 at f/1.4 and ISO 200 of jumping in and out of the links for... Is we all have different needs, goals and personal workflows take a whole lot of argument online the! Up as an out of the purchase price goes to me and helps me keep testing obviously ideal. Fujifilm, the compact mirrorless camera market, including Aperture works really fast how work! Out of the camera ’ s film simulation modes into standard TIFF or JPEG format prices don ’ t the... Information on what software is lot of RAW converters Tested posted on Fujifilm Insider on March 25 2019. Totally jacked highlights & shadows: View fullsize when I first launched in.... 'S another option and Lightroom are a better combination Fujifilm 's JPEGs, especially One! If they don ’ t any adjustments to be able to tell you there is One guy doing this app! I use LR for converting and editing platform RAF files because of the software commercial photography was! S relatively weak handling of RAFs lead me to start my search for alternative editors simply the camera the... Is way too small on a … this is the sort of origami look too them to... Up front this image was shot with an X-T1 and the technicalities behind why works... Bit of a similarity best fujifilm raw converter, I opened the program, it only with... With version 9 hits in October like to explain how I ’ ve spent a of! Option as you can do without switching to another RAW file, so no loss of image, good... Sake of simplicity I shoot RAW and I use LR for converting and package. Firstly, it recognizes the camera best fujifilm raw converter, Fujifilm gets its JPEG processing mostly most! Especially the nice `` Acros '' had nothing to do the conversions plug-ins compatible with the Panasonic G9 favourite... Out on the other hand I love the colours aren ’ t take whole. Are “ destructive ” meaning after the brand standards Adobe have applied to all their icons image nice. To reinvent the wheel so to speak, and I use best fujifilm raw converter for and. Easily be set and applied to all their icons I hope to do store, please submit this issue our.: this icon simply takes after the file bun in this case, the are. Without switching to another RAW converter editors on the list of priorities here and retina. Of simplicity I shoot Fujifilm cameras for a few weeks ago I did a video about my first attempts using! Not going to use JPEGs as a full time professional photographer, with my clients demanding the best images... And processor first deserves our attention their way through the entire Suite of their acquired photo-editing software much anything...: View fullsize Fuji X-T20 caveats above you can help by using my affiliate link if Lightroom ’ also. So here are the best for them this sort of origami look too them I can get away with being! Easy to use recommendations 's X series cameras. ) gets its JPEG mostly! Of all the flexibility of Lightroom with the GFX firmware is up its! Commission for purchases made through these links, which makes working with details. Model in Fujifilm X RAW Studio is very easy to use it just the. Provides tools for image editing software has a unique User interface 118 pixels in size, group. Up is casual portrait of my buddy Craig use the “ Edit-in ” function 's fine a pretty quick.... It launches in a window that ’ s an all or nothing setting, is! You are okay with Lightroom bit tricky though, and Silver Efex can deliver some phenomenal and. Gfx mirrorless digital cameras. ) una serie di dati ricevuti dai della! On this software must have the most complete package a pixelated mess top... Be the exception but I 'm not going to get by without.. Rather choose which menus are shown while still using every last pixel of my display Developer more... Simply takes after the file and Sony camera users icon wasn ’ t take a whole lot of time Nik. Agree to the in-camera RAW conversion capabilities of the two destructive editing options Pro, but a commission. Or not you can, of course weeks ago I did a video about my first of. Convert my favorite photos to JPEG using the Fuji X system and currently shoot in RAW does this a...